Page 12 - VETREALITY_IO1_E-COMPENDIUM_eng
P. 12

SEN students, but also where the limits of the possibilities lie. The presentation of some important
                 device manufacturers as well as some selected apps should help to make the right investments

                 in hardware and software and to facilitate a start into a hopefully long and sustainable occupation
                 with VR.





              2. RESULTS OF FOCUS GROUP WORK





              2.1 General pre-conditions, requirements, hurdles and challenges


                 The main task of the focus group work was to find out what the status quo is in the use of VR in

                 vocational education, especially in WBL with SEN students, and what competences all participants
                 need in order to successfully implement immersive learning in the classroom. For this purpose,

                 participants  were  asked  different  questions  with  the  help  of  a  semi-structured  guide,  partly
                 closed, partly open (Annex 2).


                 In the evaluation of the Focus Groups' work, we do not want to proceed completely chronologi-
                 cally. First of all, we are interested in the basic prerequisites for using VR in the classroom; for this

                 purpose, we asked VET teachers and trainers as well as policy makers, stakeholders and experts
                 to what extent they consider the situation favourable or unfavourable with regard to existing

                 broadband internet connections, available VR hardware and software, and how it relates to the
                 general  awareness, motivation  and  key  competences  of  the  different  actors  concerned.  This

                 whole complex was asked in question 3.6 of the interview form, aiming at General pre-conditions,

                 requirements, hurdles, challenges etc. when applying VR at VET/WBL.

                 The Focus Groups had to assess the degree of development of these predefined relevance areas

                 and agree on a value from 1 (= this area is not yet developed at all) to 5 (= this area is fully devel-
                 oped). Tab 2 shows how the Focus Groups in the individual countries decided, whereby the coun-

                 try abbreviations in blue (always in the upper area of the respective box) stand for the answers
                 of the group of VET teachers and trainers and the country abbreviations in brown (always in the

                 lower area) reflect the answers of the stakeholders and experts (the latter were combined in one
                 value in all countries, only Spain submitted two different values for this). At the end of the list,

                 partners were supposed to suggest additional relevance areas, but this was only used by the VET
                 teachers  and  trainers  in  France.  The  Focus  Groups  were  also  asked  to  provide  background





                                                            12                          2020-1-IT01-KA202-008380
   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17